If I tossed 5 or 10 bucks at every worthy
cause that sent me a "fundraising alert" I could easily blow through
close to $100 a day. If this is to gain political leverage over the tiny
faction of the population who can afford to throw millions of dollars
at Congress on a regular basis, how long can we be expected to try to
beat them at their own game?
Members of congress willing to rock the gravy boat seem few in number, so I don't know how we can really get big money out of politics. Meanwhile, expecting nickel-and-dime grassroots fundraising to continue to finance political positions that go against the interests of the wealthy is like expecting your health insurance premiums not to keep surging upward. I don't know about you, but I can easily be outspent. Is that how we want to decide whose ideas get to be heard?
When stockholders vote in corporate elections, those with the most shares get to make the decisions. Any small holders have to live with that. In our government we are supposed to have equal voices, so that the points of view of all citizens are taken into account. Instead we have another shareholder meeting in which the big players tell the little people what to do.
Revolution IS called for, since we can't get enough elected officials into office to make the change using what's left of our political system. But a shooting war is a stupid gambit. Just refuse to cooperate. Ride a bike. Walk. Live on less. Detach as much as possible from the corporate-controlled economy. That may mean a pretty primitive lifestyle for quite a while -- maybe a couple of generations. But think how much more primitive and brutal life would be in a country torn by civil war.
Corporatocracy will not give up easily. Their forces may lash out. Put the moral burden on them by living inoffensively.
No comments:
Post a Comment